Fostering neighborhood viscosity: does design matter?

Community Development Journal, Jan 2011

Municipal governments often struggle with growth and infrastructure while trying to emphasize collaboration between citizens and administrators in developing and implementing public programming. Neotraditional or New Urban design advocates assert neighborhood design as a response to concerns that rapid community growth, sprawl, and the resulting social and political changes lead to deteriorating quality of life and democratic participation incommunities. Advocates argue neighborhood design elements that increase pedestrian traffic and encourage social interaction may mitigate the effects of income disparity and citizen apathy. Results from this study – using geographic information systems technology along with demographic data, land use information, and neighborhood viscosity indicators – indicate traditional design elements do not necessarily associate with factors assumed to foster neighborhood viscosity such as more civic engagement.

Link to full text document: http://cdj.oxfordjournals.org/content/46/1/7.full.pdf+html

Comments are closed.

Sign up for one of our Digests (Beta)

Select list(s):

Follow BroCAP on Twitter

Click on a date to search archive

November 2014
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Disclaimer

Posts are for information purposes and do not constitute endorsement by the Brotherhood of St Laurence