Complexity Reduction and Policy Consensus: Asylum seekers, the right to work, and the ‘pull factor’ thesis in the UK context – The British Journal of Politics and International Relations

ABSTRACT

Since the early 2000s, asylum policy in Western states has become increasingly dominated by the concept of the ‘pull factor’—the idea that the economic rights afforded to asylum seekers can act as a migratory pull, and will have a bearing on the numbers of asylum applications received. The pull factor thesis has been widely discredited by researchers but remains powerful among policymakers. Through an analysis of the pull factor in the UK context, and drawing on insights from Cultural Political Economy, this article argues that the hegemony of the pull factor thesis is best understood as a ‘policy imaginary’ which has become sedimented through both discursive and extra-discursive practices and processes. The article offers a means of understanding how a common sense assumption—which is challenged by a large body of evidence—has come to dominate policymaking in a key area of concern for politicians and policymakers.

SOURCE: “Complexity Reduction and Policy Consensus: Asylum seekers, the right to work, and the ‘pull factor’ thesis in the UK context.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol 18, Issue 4, 2016.

BROTHERHOOD STAFF – please contact the LIBRARY if you would like full text access to this article

ALL USERS – see this LINK to publisher’s website [Open Access until 31 January 2017]

BroCAP is produced by the two librarians at the Brotherhood of St Laurence in Melbourne, Australia. If you find our service useful and would like to contribute to ‘Working for an Australia Free of Poverty’, please consider a donation using the link below.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Select list(s):

Follow BroCAP on Twitter

Click on a date to search archive

March 2017
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Disclaimer

Posts are for information purposes and do not constitute endorsement by the Brotherhood of St Laurence