Getting integration right is the linchpin on which all future asylum and immigration policies will be built, the report, Rebuilding after Crisis: Embedding Refugee Integration in Migration Management Systems, makes clear. But the path to the successful achievement of integration objectives is not always a clear one for policymakers. They must navigate increasingly complex public sentiments, colored by skepticism and even anger about the real and perceived prioritization of the needs of newcomers at the expense of other investments. At the same time, they must make tough choices about how best to ensure the integrity of asylum and migration systems—that is, the ability of governments to design and implement systems based on rules and consistent principles; retain control over arrival numbers and procedures; and communicate the choices and tradeoffs inherent in these systems to their publics.
“Preserving the integrity of the system as a whole … can present a particularly complex paradox,” write MPI President Emeritus Demetrios G. Papademetriou, Senior Policy Analyst Meghan Benton and International Program Associate Director Natalia Banulescu-Bogdan. “While it hinges strongly on sound integration outcomes, it is simultaneously threatened by the investments needed to foster integration if they are perceived as unfair, counterproductive or designed in a way that is not obviously anchored in the broader society’s values and concerns.”
The Council Statement offers a number of recommendations as policymakers seek to embed refugee integration within a system-wide plan that addresses how integration measures fit together with other pieces of the migration management puzzle.
“Integration is the policy and political terrain on which immigration succeeds—or fails,” the authors write. “When done well, it unlocks the benefits of immigration for receiving societies, communities and economies, while at the same time improving the opportunities available to those who seek protection or a better life for themselves and their children. By the same token, when integration fails—or publics perceive it to have failed—it contributes to declining public trust in the governance of migration and ultimately undermines support for immigration.”
In a new commentary for Europe’s World, the policy journal of Friends of Europe, Papademetriou examines how spontaneous migration flows test other fundamental aspects of governance in Europe. The piece, The Migration Crisis Is Over: Long Live the Migration Crisis, looks ahead to future migration challenges and ways in which to anticipate and minimize them. “Everyone needs to understand that while the immediate test of leadership is dealing with the causes and consequences of the 2015-16 migration crisis, the true challenge for Europe in the decades ahead will be mass migration from Africa,” Papademetriou writes. “Much larger public and private resources must be invested in creating opportunities for Africans to stay and build lives in their own countries. Otherwise Europe will find itself taking more extreme steps to protect itself, with less success.”
SOURCE: Migration Policy Institute. “In Getting Refugee Integration Right, Policymakers Must Take Care to Ensure Integrity of Asylum & Migration Systems, New MPI Report Explains.” MPI Press Release, 14 March, 2017.
BroCAP is produced by the two librarians at the Brotherhood of St Laurence in Melbourne, Australia.