As many governments raise eligibility ages for retirement bene?ts, there are concerns that such reforms disproportionately affect poorer households. In this paper, I examine the distributional effects of a 1994 Australian reform that increased women’s pension-eligibility age from 60 to 65. Using detailed longitudinal data, I ?nd strong negative effects on household incomes for low-to-middle-income households but little impact on high-income households. The unequal impacts meant that, among affected households, the reform increased relative poverty rates by 33 to 39 percent and inequality measures by 12 to 15 percent. These results demonstrate that such reforms can be signi?cantly regressive.
SOURCE: Todd Morris. “The Unequal Burden of Retirement Reform: Evidence from Australia.” SSRN, 2019.
Link to full text (@ 02 August 2019)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY
The Brotherhood of St Laurence acknowledges and recognises the Traditional Owners of the land upon which we live and work, and we pay our respects to their Elders both past and present
Produced by the librarians at the Brotherhood of St Laurence in Melbourne, Australia